Workaround for missing NOT in complex conditions

Workaround for missing NOT in complex conditions
0

#1

It does not seem possible to have a NOT in the conditional logic. What is the workaround? Do I have to define to complementary variables if I want to do include both positive and negative conditions in a logic block?


#2

Hey @eussrh,
the idea is to create an additional condition that covers the inverse interpretation (thus the NOT version of condition).
What is the variable type you are dealing with? Is it a boolean, string, or numeric?